Advocating for the court’s power to remedy discriminatory lawmaking
CLAS intervened in a Supreme Court of Canada hearing examining the role of the courts when governments invoke the Charter’s notwithstanding clause: English Montreal School Board, et al. v. Attorney General of Quebec, et al., Supreme Court File No. 41231. The case involves the constitutionality of a Quebec law about secularism and religious symbols.
CLAS’s submissions argued that courts have the power to invalidate legislation that violates the unwritten constitutional principle of non-discrimination. The Charter must be interpreted in light of the principle of non-discrimination, empowering courts to provide remedies that create real deterrence against discriminatory legislation, even if governments attempt to shield them with the notwithstanding clause.
You can read CLAS’s factum here.
The case was heard from March 23-26, 2026 and judgment is under reserve.
March 23-26, 2026: The Supreme Court of Canada heard submissions in the case.
Read More: CLAS intervenes in Bill 21 Case Before the Supreme Court of Canada
July 23, 2025: The Supreme Court of Canada granted CLAS leave to intervene in the appeal.
January 23, 2025: The Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal from the Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision.
Read the Supreme Court of Canada’s leave decision.
February 29, 2024: The Quebec Court of Appeal released its decision in the case.
Read the Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision.
April 20, 2021: The Superior Court of Quebec released its decision in the case.
Steve Rukavina, “6 key moments from the Supreme Court challenge of Quebec’s secularism law”, CBC News, March 27, 2026
Jessica Mach, “‘We’re not teetering on the edge… of fascism’: SCC hears intervenors, closing arguments in Bill 21 case”, Canadian Lawyer Magazine, March 26, 2026
