Income Security Law Reform
An income security regime that is inaccessible and insufficient to meet the needs of most people remains one of the most marginalizing forces for low and fixed income populations. Our income security law reform work strategically targets government systems and practices currently in place that negatively impact low and fixed income residents of British Columbia.
Our law reform work is done through consultations with advocates and advocacy organizations. We attend stakeholder meetings and participate in collaborative community projects that promote the health and well-being of British Columbians by addressing poverty and income insecurity.
Access to the Employment and Assistance Appeals Tribunal
The Employment and Assistance Appeals Tribunal (EAAT) forms the last level of appeal of decisions involving provincial income and disability assistance. We sit on a stakeholder committee, along with other advocacy organizations, to consult on recommendations for reform to EAAT.
As part of this committee, we advocate for law reform to make EAAT more accessible.
Poverty Reduction Coalition
CLAS participates on the Poverty Reduction Coalition, a large and diverse coalition that advocates for a accountable, bold and comprehensive poverty reduction plan from the government of British Columbia that would include legislated targets and timelines to significantly reduce poverty and homelessness.
Gillis v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 FC 504
CLAS successfully represented this veteran in challenging the assessment of his pension by the Veterans Review and Appeals Board.
Harley v. Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal, 2006 BCSC 1420
CLAS successfully represented a woman who had been denied income assistance on the basis of inadequate reasons by the Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal.
Hudson v. British Columbia (Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal), 2009 BCSC 1461
CLAS successfully represented a woman who had been found ineligible for person with disability (PWD) benefits on the basis of inadequate reasons. This case clarifies the criteria to be applied to a determination of whether a person qualifies for PWD benefits.
Reports & Submissions
What would it take to make BC the most progressive province for people living with disabilities?
March 2014 – As a partner in the Disability Without Poverty Network, CLAS worked with disability advocates to provide detailed and comprehensive recommendations in response to the province’s call for submissions on its Disability White Paper.
Income Security News
Advanced Topics in Judicial Review: Adequacy of Reasons
In this series, we build on the foundations of our […]
Advanced Topics in Judicial Review: Adequacy of Reasons
In this series, we build on the foundations of our […]
Changes to Employment Insurance (2021)
There are changes to the EI program starting September 27, […]
Intro to JR: The Basics of Procedural Fairness
In Part 6 of our “Intro to Judicial Review” blog […]
Intro to JR: The Basics of Patent Unreasonableness
A judge on judicial review will only overturn a decision […]
Intro to JR: Glossary of Terms
All the key Judicial Review terms explained in one place. […]